Cryptocurrency and Online Gambling

Info: 6192 words (25 pages) Report
Last Edited: 10th Nov 2025 by David Norman

Working Title: Cryptocurrency and Online Gambling - A Regulatory Intelligence Report

Executive Summary

The proliferation of cryptocurrency payments in online gambling represents a significant challenge for licensing authorities and regulatory bodies worldwide. This whitepaper examines the expanding use of digital currencies within the casino sector, with particular emphasis on the critical distinction between dedicated crypto casinos and traditional online casinos that accept cryptocurrency payments alongside conventional payment methods.

The online gambling industry has undergone substantial transformation since the emergence of cryptocurrency payment options, with Bitcoin and other digital assets becoming increasingly prevalent in casino operations. Research indicates that cryptocurrency transactions in gambling reached approximately $31.5 billion in 2022, with projections suggesting continued growth throughout 2025 and beyond (Chainalysis, cited in International Federation of Horseracing Authorities, 2024).

This report identifies two distinct categories of cryptocurrency-enabled gambling platforms, each presenting unique regulatory challenges. Dedicated crypto casinos operate exclusively or primarily with digital currencies, often with minimal Know Your Customer (KYC) requirements and enhanced anonymity features. Traditional online casinos accepting crypto payments maintain conventional operational frameworks whilst incorporating cryptocurrency as an additional payment option, typically subject to existing regulatory oversight.

The dual risks identified in this analysis encompass both the inherent vulnerabilities associated with cryptocurrency transactions and the specific challenges posed by online gambling operations. These risks include anti-money laundering (AML) concerns, consumer protection deficits, regulatory arbitrage, jurisdictional challenges, and the particular vulnerabilities of players exposed to both gambling risks and cryptocurrency volatility.

Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) guidance issued in May 2019 clarifies that online casinos accepting and transmitting cryptocurrency may qualify as money transmitters under the Bank Secrecy Act, requiring registration as Money Service Businesses and implementation of comprehensive AML programmes (Bloomberg Law, 2019). Despite this regulatory framework, enforcement and compliance remain inconsistent across jurisdictions.

1. Introduction

1.1 Background and Context

The convergence of cryptocurrency technology and online gambling represents one of the most significant developments in the digital gaming sector over the past decade. Since Bitcoin's introduction in 2009, digital currencies have progressively penetrated the online gambling market, fundamentally altering payment processing, player anonymity, and regulatory oversight mechanisms.

The formal online gambling market is projected to exceed $205 billion by 2030, with the Asia Pacific region representing the largest share of market growth between 2022 and 2026 at a projected 37 per cent (United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, 2024). Cryptocurrency adoption within this expanding market has accelerated substantially, driven by factors including transaction speed, reduced processing fees, enhanced privacy, and accessibility in jurisdictions with restrictive banking regulations.

The University of Nevada Las Vegas International Center for Gaming Regulation conducted comprehensive research examining anti-money laundering risks associated with cryptocurrency payments in the gambling sector. This research identifies that gambling markets, both land-based and online casinos, are evolving rapidly to accept cryptocurrency payments, whilst regulators struggle to maintain pace with technological changes and implement adequate safeguards against potential money laundering risks (UNLV International Center for Gaming Regulation, 2024).

1.2 Scope and Objectives

This whitepaper addresses the expanding use of cryptocurrencies within the online casino sector, with specific focus on distinguishing operational models, risk profiles, and regulatory implications. The primary objectives include:

• Establishing clear taxonomic distinctions between dedicated crypto casinos and traditional online casinos accepting cryptocurrency payments
• Examining the technical infrastructure and operational characteristics of cryptocurrency-enabled gambling platforms
• Analysing anti-money laundering vulnerabilities specific to cryptocurrency gambling operations
• Evaluating consumer protection challenges and player vulnerability factors
• Assessing current regulatory frameworks and their effectiveness in addressing cryptocurrency gambling risks
• Providing evidence-based recommendations for licensing authorities and regulatory bodies

1.3 Methodology

This analysis draws upon authoritative sources including regulatory guidance from the UK Gambling Commission, Malta Gaming Authority, and Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, academic research from recognised institutions, industry reports from established organisations, and case studies from multiple jurisdictions. The research employs a comparative analytical framework to distinguish operational models and risk profiles across different casino types accepting cryptocurrency payments.

2. Defining the Cryptocurrency Gambling Landscape

2.1 Dedicated Crypto Casinos

2.1.1 Operational Characteristics

Dedicated crypto casinos represent gambling platforms operating exclusively or primarily with cryptocurrency payments. These platforms exhibit distinct operational characteristics that fundamentally differentiate them from traditional online casinos. BestCasinoSites.net identifies that crypto casinos operate on blockchain technology, recording every transaction in a decentralised, tamper-proof ledger, which speeds up deposits and withdrawals whilst allowing platforms to implement provably fair algorithms (BestCasinoSites.net, 2025).

The technical infrastructure of dedicated crypto casinos typically incorporates the following elements:

• Blockchain-based transaction processing: All financial transactions occur directly on blockchain networks, eliminating traditional payment intermediaries. Bitcoin transactions typically confirm within 10 to 60 minutes, whilst faster networks such as Litecoin complete confirmations within minutes
• Reduced identification requirements: Many dedicated crypto casinos allow players to register using only a cryptocurrency wallet address, substantially reducing traditional KYC procedures. BestCasinoSites.net notes that platforms may not require identity verification for withdrawals below certain thresholds, typically around €2,000
• Provably fair gaming mechanisms: Dedicated platforms frequently implement blockchain-verified randomness, allowing players to independently verify game outcomes through cryptographic algorithms
• Multi-cryptocurrency support: Platforms typically accept numerous digital currencies including Bitcoin, Ethereum, Litecoin, Tether, Solana, and emerging altcoins
• Decentralised operational structures: Some platforms operate as Decentralised Autonomous Organisations (DAOs) where token holders vote on operational decisions including house edge percentages and game selection

2.1.2 Licensing and Regulatory Status

The regulatory landscape for dedicated crypto casinos exhibits substantial variation across jurisdictions. Research indicates that many crypto casinos operate under licences from jurisdictions with minimal regulatory oversight, particularly Curacao, which offers streamlined licensing processes and limited compliance requirements (SCCG Management, 2024). The Curacao Gaming Authority licence remains popular amongst crypto casino operators seeking rapid market entry with reduced regulatory burden.

Malta represents a contrasting regulatory approach, having positioned itself as a global hub for cryptocurrency gambling operations. The Malta Gaming Authority established a Blockchain Sandbox Framework amongst the first regulatory bodies globally, allowing operators to test crypto gambling platforms under controlled conditions. In 2023, Malta updated its regulatory framework with the Virtual Financial Assets Act, providing specific guidelines addressing blockchain-specific concerns including smart contract auditing and cold storage requirements (Coincub, 2025).

2.2 Traditional Casinos Accepting Cryptocurrency

2.2.1 Hybrid Payment Models

Traditional online casinos accepting cryptocurrency payments maintain fundamentally different operational structures compared to dedicated crypto platforms. These establishments operate hybrid payment models, offering cryptocurrency options alongside conventional payment methods including credit cards, debit cards, e-wallets, and bank transfers. BestCasinoSites.net documentation indicates that platforms such as Nomini Casino provide mixed fiat and crypto support, accepting five major cryptocurrencies daily whilst maintaining traditional banking infrastructure (BestCasinoSites.net, 2025).

The hybrid model typically incorporates automatic fiat conversion mechanisms, where cryptocurrency deposits convert immediately to Euro, British Pound, or other fiat currencies upon receipt. This approach mitigates cryptocurrency volatility risks for both operators and players, maintaining stable account balances whilst preserving the transaction speed benefits associated with cryptocurrency payments.

2.2.2 Regulatory Compliance Framework

Traditional online casinos accepting cryptocurrency payments generally operate under established regulatory frameworks, maintaining licences from recognised gambling authorities including the UK Gambling Commission, Malta Gaming Authority, or Isle of Man Gambling Supervision Commission. These platforms remain subject to comprehensive regulatory requirements regardless of payment method acceptance.

The UK Gambling Commission requires operators accepting cryptocurrency to verify the source of crypto funds and implement additional KYC procedures for transactions exceeding £2,000. The Commission mandates that operators convert cryptocurrencies to fiat values in player accounts to ensure transparency and mitigate consumer volatility risks (Coincub, 2025). This regulatory approach prioritises consumer protection whilst accommodating technological innovation within existing oversight structures.

3. Risk Analysis: Cryptocurrency in Online Gambling

3.1 Anti-Money Laundering Vulnerabilities

3.1.1 Anonymity and Transaction Opacity

Cryptocurrency transactions present substantial challenges for anti-money laundering efforts within the gambling sector. The pseudonymous nature of blockchain transactions, combined with reduced identification requirements at many crypto casinos, creates significant opportunities for money laundering activity. ComplyAdvantage research indicates that gambling emerged as one of the top three sectors incurring the highest amount of AML fines in 2023, accumulating over $475 million in penalties (ComplyAdvantage, 2024).

The World Lotteries Association identifies that cryptocurrencies facilitate money laundering through several mechanisms. The pseudo-anonymous structure of blockchain networks, decentralised systems, and privacy-enhancing tools including mixers, privacy coins, and cross-chain transfers allow illicit actors to move funds through the betting ecosystem with relative ease (World Lotteries Association, 2024).

The International Federation of Horseracing Authorities warns that cryptocurrency adoption in illegal betting has prompted a sharp rise in unauthorised gambling websites. The research indicates that approximately $31.5 billion in cryptocurrency was laundered in 2022 through various channels, with gambling platforms representing a significant proportion of this activity (International Federation of Horseracing Authorities, 2024).

3.1.2 Cross-Border Transaction Complexity

The borderless nature of cryptocurrency transactions substantially complicates AML enforcement. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime analysis estimates that more than 340 licensed and unlicensed land-based casinos operated in Southeast Asia as of early 2022, with most having shifted online to offer live-dealer streaming and proxy betting services. The research describes how online casinos and related businesses facilitate the movement and laundering of massive volumes of state-backed fiat currencies and cryptocurrencies, effectively creating channels for integrating billions in criminal proceeds into the financial system (UNODC, 2024).

3.1.3 Regulatory Arbitrage

Many crypto casino operators exploit jurisdictional differences in regulatory stringency, establishing operations in locations with minimal oversight whilst serving customers globally. The UK Gambling Commission indicates that some British gamblers prefer offshore crypto gambling platforms where KYC requirements remain less stringent than in regulated jurisdictions, avoiding requests for bank statements, payslips, and tax return statements (UNLV International Center for Gaming Regulation, 2024).

3.2 Consumer Protection Challenges

3.2.1 Price Volatility Exposure

Cryptocurrency price volatility creates unique consumer protection challenges within gambling contexts. BestCasinoSites.net documentation emphasises that cryptocurrency values fluctuate significantly, affecting casino balances in fiat terms. A €100 deposit could be worth €80 or €120 within hours, independent of gaming outcomes. This double-edged sword means potential gains from market movements but also unexpected losses before placing a single bet (BestCasinoSites.net, 2025).

The compound risk of gambling losses and cryptocurrency devaluation presents particular concern for vulnerable players. Research conducted by the International Federation of Horseracing Authorities warns that promotional offers exploit demographics most at risk of gambling harm whilst drawing them deeper into unregulated environments (International Federation of Horseracing Authorities, 2024).

3.2.2 Limited Recourse Mechanisms

The irreversible nature of cryptocurrency transactions eliminates traditional chargeback protections available through credit card or bank transfer systems. BestCasinoSites.net explicitly warns that cryptocurrency transactions are irreversible, and sending funds to incorrect addresses results in permanent loss (BestCasinoSites.net, 2025). Players at unlicensed or poorly regulated crypto casinos face substantial difficulties recovering funds in cases of dispute, platform failure, or fraudulent activity.

3.2.3 Regulatory Gap Consequences

The regulatory vacuum surrounding many crypto casino operations creates significant consumer protection deficits. Unlicensed platforms may lack adequate responsible gambling tools, self-exclusion mechanisms, or dispute resolution procedures. The absence of player fund segregation requirements at some jurisdictions exposes customers to insolvency risks should operators encounter financial difficulties.

3.3 Technical and Operational Risks

3.3.1 Smart Contract Vulnerabilities

Decentralised casino platforms operating through smart contracts face unique technical risks. Smart contract vulnerabilities, coding errors, or exploitation of protocol weaknesses can result in substantial player losses or platform failures. The complexity of blockchain technology creates barriers to effective oversight and consumer understanding of underlying risks.

3.3.2 Wallet Security Concerns

Players must maintain secure cryptocurrency wallets to participate in crypto gambling, introducing additional security requirements and potential vulnerabilities. BestCasinoSites.net recommends establishing separate wallets for gambling and investments, enabling two-factor authentication, storing recovery phrases offline in multiple secure locations, and maintaining regular backups of wallet files and private keys (BestCasinoSites.net, 2025). However, many players lack the technical sophistication to implement these security measures effectively.

4. Regulatory Landscape Analysis

4.1 United States Framework

The United States maintains a fragmented regulatory approach to cryptocurrency gambling, with substantial variation across state jurisdictions. Financial Crimes Enforcement Network guidance issued in March 2013 clarified that Bank Secrecy Act AML provisions apply to all transactions involving money transmission, including virtual currency. Subsequent May 2019 guidance established that online casinos accepting and transmitting cryptocurrency might qualify as money transmitters under the BSA, requiring registration as Money Service Businesses with FinCEN (Bloomberg Law, 2019).

FinCEN director Kenneth Blanco emphasised that casinos dealing in cryptocurrency must design AML programmes unique to the risks posed by such transactions, including processes for conducting due diligence on digital currency, blockchain analytics to determine cryptocurrency sources, and mechanisms for identifying red flags for money laundering, sanctions evasion, and other illicit financing purposes (Bloomberg Law, 2019). However, cryptocurrency-related Suspicious Activity Report filings by casinos have not been as robust as expected since the 2019 guidance publication.

4.2 United Kingdom Approach

The UK Gambling Commission maintains stringent oversight of cryptocurrency gambling operations. The Commission places conditions on gambling operators accepting cryptocurrency and must be satisfied that operators can meet obligations relating to anti-money laundering and social responsibility. Recent UKGC guidance requires operators to verify the source of crypto funds and implement additional KYC procedures for transactions exceeding £2,000 (Coincub, 2025).

The UKGC mandates that operators convert cryptocurrencies to fiat values in player accounts to ensure transparency and mitigate consumer volatility risks. This regulatory approach prioritises player protection over technological permissiveness, though some industry observers note that excessive KYC requirements have driven British gamblers towards offshore crypto gambling platforms (UNLV International Center for Gaming Regulation, 2024).

4.3 Malta Gaming Authority Framework

Malta has established itself as a leading jurisdiction for regulated cryptocurrency gambling operations. The Malta Gaming Authority was amongst the first regulators globally to offer legislation regulating online gambling company activities and creating secure atmospheres for players. The MGA introduced a Blockchain Sandbox Framework, allowing operators to test crypto gambling platforms under controlled regulatory conditions (Coincub, 2025).

The 2023 Virtual Financial Assets Act provides specific guidelines for crypto gambling operators, addressing blockchain-specific concerns including smart contract auditing and cold storage requirements. The MGA now issues specialised licences that incorporate these technical considerations whilst maintaining comprehensive player protection standards. The Authority has announced enhanced regulatory oversight approaches for 2025, emphasising evidence-driven and outcomes-focused regulatory models (Gambling News, 2025).

4.4 Offshore Jurisdictions

Jurisdictions including Curacao and Costa Rica have attracted substantial crypto casino operations through minimal regulatory requirements and streamlined licensing processes. The Curacao Gaming Authority licence offers rapid market entry with limited compliance obligations, making it particularly attractive to crypto-native operators. However, this regulatory leniency has led to increased scrutiny from international authorities concerned about money laundering risks and consumer protection deficits (SCCG Management, 2024).

5. Comparative Analysis: Crypto Casinos vs Traditional Casinos

5.1 Operational Distinctions

The operational differences between dedicated crypto casinos and traditional online casinos accepting cryptocurrency payments extend beyond simple payment method acceptance. These distinctions encompass fundamental aspects of platform architecture, regulatory compliance, player verification, and business model structure.

Characteristic	Dedicated Crypto Casinos	Traditional Casinos Accepting Crypto
Payment Methods	Exclusively or primarily cryptocurrency	Hybrid model including fiat and crypto options
KYC Requirements	Minimal or threshold-based, often not required below €2,000	Comprehensive verification required regardless of payment method
Licensing	Often Curacao or minimally regulated jurisdictions	UKGC, MGA, or other established regulatory authorities
Volatility Management	Direct exposure to cryptocurrency price fluctuations	Typically offers immediate fiat conversion options
AML Oversight	Variable, often limited in offshore jurisdictions	Comprehensive AML programmes required by licensing authority
Consumer Protection	Variable, may lack segregated funds or dispute resolution	Mandatory player fund segregation, dispute mechanisms, RG tools

5.2 Risk Profile Differentiation

The risk profiles associated with dedicated crypto casinos and traditional casinos accepting cryptocurrency differ substantially across multiple dimensions:

• Anti-money laundering risks: Dedicated crypto casinos present elevated AML risks due to reduced identification requirements, enhanced anonymity features, and frequent operation in minimally regulated jurisdictions. Traditional casinos maintaining comprehensive KYC procedures and operating under established regulatory oversight demonstrate lower AML risk profiles
• Consumer protection levels: Traditional licensed operators typically provide robust player protections including segregated funds, dispute resolution mechanisms, and responsible gambling tools. Dedicated crypto platforms, particularly those in offshore jurisdictions, may lack these safeguards
• Regulatory oversight: Traditional operators accepting crypto payments remain subject to existing regulatory frameworks, whilst dedicated crypto casinos may operate in regulatory grey areas or under minimal oversight structures
• Volatility exposure: Players at dedicated crypto casinos face direct cryptocurrency price volatility, potentially amplifying gambling losses. Traditional platforms offering immediate fiat conversion mitigate this risk

6. Recommendations for Licensing Authorities

6.1 Regulatory Classification Framework

Licensing authorities should establish clear taxonomic distinctions between dedicated crypto casinos and traditional operators accepting cryptocurrency payments. This classification framework should inform differentiated regulatory requirements, compliance expectations, and oversight intensity appropriate to the distinct risk profiles of each category.

Dedicated crypto casinos should face enhanced scrutiny including mandatory comprehensive KYC procedures regardless of transaction size, source of funds verification for cryptocurrency deposits, blockchain analytics requirements to trace transaction origins, enhanced AML programme requirements, and regular independent audits of technical infrastructure including smart contracts and random number generators.

6.2 Enhanced Anti-Money Laundering Standards

Regulators should implement cryptocurrency-specific AML requirements incorporating blockchain analytical capabilities, transaction pattern monitoring, and cross-platform tracking mechanisms. The Financial Crimes Enforcement Network model requiring blockchain analytics to determine cryptocurrency sources and identify red flags for illicit financing represents best practice (Bloomberg Law, 2019).

Key AML enhancements should include:

• Mandatory transaction monitoring systems capable of analysing blockchain data
• Enhanced due diligence for cryptocurrency transactions exceeding defined thresholds
• Prohibition of privacy coin acceptance where transaction tracing proves impossible
• Mandatory suspicious transaction reporting with blockchain-specific indicators
• Regular independent audits of AML systems and compliance effectiveness

6.3 Consumer Protection Enhancements

Licensing authorities should mandate specific consumer protection measures for cryptocurrency gambling operations. These protections should address the unique risks associated with digital currency volatility, transaction irreversibility, and technical complexity.

Recommended consumer protection measures include:

• Mandatory disclosure of cryptocurrency price volatility risks in clear, accessible language
• Options for immediate fiat conversion to mitigate volatility exposure
• Segregation of player cryptocurrency holdings in cold storage wallets
• Proof of reserves requirements ensuring operator solvency
• Enhanced responsible gambling tools including deposit limits in both crypto and fiat values
• Clear dispute resolution procedures with independent arbitration mechanisms

6.4 Technical Standards Development

Regulators should establish technical standards for cryptocurrency casino operations, particularly platforms utilising smart contracts or decentralised architectures. Malta Gaming Authority's approach requiring smart contract auditing and cold storage specifications provides a useful model (Coincub, 2025).

Technical standards should encompass:

• Mandatory independent security audits of smart contracts before deployment
• Certification requirements for random number generators and provably fair systems
• Cold storage requirements for player cryptocurrency holdings
• Wallet security standards and key management protocols
• Blockchain verification mechanisms for transaction transparency

6.5 International Cooperation Mechanisms

The borderless nature of cryptocurrency transactions necessitates enhanced international regulatory cooperation. The recent Memorandum of Understanding between the UK Gambling Commission and Malta Gaming Authority for data sharing and mutual support represents a positive development (TopNews, 2024).

Licensing authorities should pursue:

• Information sharing agreements on cryptocurrency gambling operations
• Coordinated enforcement actions against illegal operations
• Harmonisation of minimum regulatory standards for crypto gambling
• Joint research initiatives on emerging risks and regulatory challenges
• Collaborative approaches to addressing regulatory arbitrage

7. Conclusion

The proliferation of cryptocurrency payments in online gambling presents significant regulatory challenges requiring sophisticated and nuanced responses from licensing authorities. The critical distinction between dedicated crypto casinos and traditional online casinos accepting cryptocurrency payments must inform differentiated regulatory approaches, recognising the substantially different risk profiles, operational characteristics, and consumer protection implications associated with each category.

Dedicated crypto casinos operating with minimal identification requirements, enhanced anonymity features, and frequently in jurisdictions with limited regulatory oversight present elevated risks across multiple dimensions. These platforms facilitate potential money laundering activity, expose players to compound risks from gambling losses and cryptocurrency volatility, and often lack robust consumer protection mechanisms. The absence of effective regulatory oversight creates environments where illicit activities can flourish and vulnerable players face substantial harm.

Traditional online casinos incorporating cryptocurrency as an additional payment option whilst maintaining comprehensive regulatory compliance, established KYC procedures, and robust player protection frameworks demonstrate markedly different risk profiles. These platforms can harness the technological advantages of cryptocurrency payments including transaction speed and reduced processing costs whilst preserving the consumer safeguards and oversight mechanisms associated with established regulatory frameworks.

The evidence presented throughout this analysis indicates that cryptocurrency adoption in gambling reached approximately $31.5 billion in laundered funds in 2022, with the sector accumulating over $475 million in AML fines in 2023. These figures underscore the magnitude of the regulatory challenge and the imperative for enhanced oversight mechanisms specifically addressing cryptocurrency gambling operations.

Effective regulation of cryptocurrency gambling requires implementation of enhanced AML standards incorporating blockchain analytics capabilities, establishment of cryptocurrency-specific consumer protection measures addressing volatility and technical risks, development of technical standards for smart contracts and decentralised platforms, creation of clear taxonomic distinctions informing differentiated regulatory requirements, and fostering international cooperation mechanisms to address cross-border challenges.

The Malta Gaming Authority's progressive approach incorporating specialised technical standards and the UK Gambling Commission's stringent consumer protection requirements provide instructive models for other jurisdictions. However, international coordination remains essential given the borderless nature of cryptocurrency transactions and the ease with which operators can exploit jurisdictional differences through regulatory arbitrage.

Licensing authorities must balance technological innovation with consumer protection and public safety imperatives. Whilst cryptocurrency payments offer genuine benefits including transaction efficiency and financial inclusion, these advantages cannot justify compromised AML standards or inadequate player safeguards. Regulatory frameworks must evolve to address the unique characteristics and risks associated with cryptocurrency gambling whilst maintaining fundamental principles of fair play, consumer protection, and prevention of criminal exploitation.

The expanding use of cryptocurrency in online gambling will continue presenting regulatory challenges as technology evolves and adoption increases. Licensing authorities adopting proactive, evidence-based approaches informed by clear taxonomic distinctions and international best practices will be best positioned to protect consumers, prevent illicit activities, and foster responsible innovation within this rapidly evolving sector.

References

BestCasinoSites.net (2025) Crypto Casinos for Irish Players. Available at: https://www.bestcasinosites.net/en-ie/payments/crypto/ (Accessed: 10 November 2025).

Bloomberg Law (2019) Insight: FinCen Has Eye on Sports Betting, Crypto Money Laundering Risks. Available at: https://news.bloomberglaw.com/us-law-week/insight-fincen-has-eye-on-sports-betting-crypto-money-laundering-risks (Accessed: 10 November 2025).

Coincub (2025) What Are the Latest Laws on Gambling with Crypto Around the World? Available at: https://coincub.com/what-are-the-latest-laws-on-gambling-with-crypto-around-the-world/ (Accessed: 10 November 2025).

ComplyAdvantage (2024) Money Laundering Through Online Gambling. Available at: https://complyadvantage.com/insights/online-gambling-money-laundering/ (Accessed: 10 November 2025).

Gambling News (2025) MGA Enhances Regulatory Oversight Approach, Lays Down Core Goals. Available at: https://www.gamblingnews.com/news/mga-enhances-regulatory-oversight-approach-lays-down-core-goals/ (Accessed: 10 November 2025).

International Federation of Horseracing Authorities (2024) Unregulated and Unstoppable: Crypto's Surge Fuels Illegal Betting Boom. Available at: https://agbrief.com/news/world/16/10/2025/unregulated-and-unstoppable-cryptos-surge-fuels-illegal-betting-boom/ (Accessed: 10 November 2025).

SCCG Management (2024) Regulatory Scrutiny Looms Over The Booming Crypto Casino Industry. Available at: https://sccgmanagement.com/sccg-articles/2024/9/24/regulatory-scrutiny-looms-over-the-booming-crypto-casino-industry/ (Accessed: 10 November 2025).

TopNews (2024) UK Gambling Commission (UKGC) and Malta Gaming Authority (MGA) Partner For Data Sharing. Available at: https://topnews.in/uk-gambling-commission-ukgc-and-malta-gaming-authority-mga-partner-data-sharing-2415519 (Accessed: 10 November 2025).

United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (2024) Casinos and Cryptocurrency: Major Drivers of Money Laundering, Underground Banking, and Cyberfraud in East and Southeast Asia. Available at: https://www.unodc.org/roseap/en/2024/casinos-casinos-cryptocurrency-underground-banking/story.html (Accessed: 10 November 2025).

University of Nevada Las Vegas International Center for Gaming Regulation (2024) An Assessment of AML Risks Linked to Accepting Crypto-Payments in the Gambling Sector. Available at: https://www.unlv.edu/sites/default/files/media/document/2024-02/ICGR-Research-AML-Crypto-in-Gaming-Sector.pdf (Accessed: 10 November 2025).

World Lotteries Association (2024) How Blockchain and Cryptocurrencies Are Used in Illegal Gaming. Available at: https://www.world-lotteries.org/insights/editorial/blog/how-blockchain-and-cryptocurrencies-are-used-in-illegal-gaming (Accessed: 10 November 2025).